Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Samuelson-Brandon v. United States Senate et al
as 3:2024cv00233
Plaintiff:
Shawn Samuelson-Brandon
Defendant:
United States Senate, United States House and White House
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Thielman et al v. Kotek et al
as 3:2023cv01639
Plaintiff:
Marc Thielman, Senator Dennis Linthicum, Senator Kim Thatcher and others
Defendant:
Tina Kotek, Lavonne Griffin-Valade and Molly Woon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Thielman et al v. Fagan et al
as 3:2022cv01516
Plaintiff:
Marc Thielman, Ben Edtl, Don Powers and others
Defendant:
Shemia Fagan, Clackamas County, Washington County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ealy et al v. Redfield et al
as 3:2022cv00356
Plaintiff:
Dr. Henry Ealy, III, Dennis Linthicum, Kim Thatcher and others
Defendant:
Robert Redfield, Rochelle Walensky, Alex Azar and others
United States of America, ex rel v. Linthicum
as 3:2022cv00306
Plaintiff:
United States of America, ex rel, Oregon State Senator Dennis Linthicum, Oregon State Senator Kim Thatcher and others
Defendant:
Robert Redfield, Rochelle Walensky, Alex Azar and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00262
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2021cv00780
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00780
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Demos v. U.S. et al
as 3:2019cv01530
Defendant:
U.S., State of Oregon, State of Washington and others
Plaintiff:
John Robert Demos
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vrooman v. Brown et al
as 3:2017cv01161
Defendant:
Katherine Brown, Dennis Richardson, State of Oregon Representatives and others
Plaintiff:
Ronald Charles Vrooman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
