Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Harris v. NationStar Mortgage LLC et al
as 1:2019cv03251
Defendant:
Seterus, Inc. and NationStar Mortgage LLC
Plaintiff:
Sharon Harris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444
Brown-El v. Seterus, Inc., et al et al
as 2:2018cv00268
Plaintiff:
Dawne Brown-El
Defendant:
Seterus, Inc., et al, The Federal National Mortgage Association (Fannie Mae) et al, Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. aka ("MERS") et al and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 2601
Crouse v. Bank of America N.A. et al
as 5:2018cv00059
Plaintiff:
Larry Crouse
Defendant:
Bank of America N.A. and Seterus, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Askew et al v. Seterus, Inc.
as 2:2018cv00007
Plaintiff:
William L. Askew, Sr. and Toora B. Askew
Defendant:
Seterus, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Whitt v. Seterus Inc et al
as 3:2017cv01753
Plaintiff:
D Randolph Whitt
Defendant:
Seterus Inc and Federal National Mortgage Association
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Reaves v. Seterus Inc.
as 5:2017cv00156
Plaintiff:
Margaret Reaves
Defendant:
Seterus Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Moore, et al v. Seterus, Inc., et al
as 4:2016cv00293
Plaintiff:
Gwenda G. Moore and R. Wilton Moore
Defendant:
Seterus, Inc. , Federal National Mortgage Association , The Bank of New York Mellon and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Whitt v. Seterus Inc et al
as 3:2016cv02422
Plaintiff:
D Randolph Whitt
Defendant:
Seterus Inc and Federal National Mortgage Association
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Harry v. Bank of America NA et al
as 8:2016cv01563
Plaintiff:
Timothy Harry
Defendant:
Bank of America NA , Seterus Inc and Safeguard Properties Management LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Askew, et al v. Seterus, Inc.
as 2:2016cv00013
Plaintiff:
William L. Askew, Sr. and Toora B. Askew
Defendant:
Seterus, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
