Cases 1 - 10 of 663
Samuels et al v. Liberty Surplus Insurance Corporation
as 3:2024cv02744
Plaintiff:
Seth Samuels, Stephen Samuels, Stacy Samuels and others
Defendant:
Liberty Surplus Insurance Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Black v. Massey et al
as 3:2024cv00668
Plaintiff:
Johnathan R. Black
Defendant:
Caprice Massey, Patrick Garrett, Seth Honl and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lewis et al v. Future Motion, Inc.
as 5:2024cv02287
Plaintiff:
Seth Lewis and Ashley Lewis
Defendant:
Future Motion, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
United States of America v. Randles
as 24-2360
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
SETH RANDLES
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv02191
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Sex Discrimination
Talley et al v. Monsanto Company
as 3:2024cv01876
Plaintiff:
Seth Talley and Lyda Talley
Defendant:
Monsanto Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Ingram et al v. Ada County
as 1:2024cv00152
Plaintiff:
Dustin Ingram, Felisha Ingram, L.I. Ingram and others
Defendant:
Ada County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Other Civil Rights
Keene, et al. v. City and County of San Francisco, et al.
as 24-1574
Plaintiff:
SELINA KEENE, MARK MCCLURE, MELODY FOUNTILA and others
Defendant:
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, LONDON BREED, CAROL ISEN and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv01544
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Maninder Singh et al v. Richard Taraska et al
as 2:2024cv02080
Plaintiff:
Maninder Singh and Sandip Seth
Defendant:
Richard Taraska and Michael Taraska
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
