Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00326
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00327
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
BOWMAN v. STANLEY et al
as 1:2023cv01794
Plaintiff:
KAI A BOWMAN
Defendant:
SETH STANLEY, JOSEPH SHAFER, TAYLOR BAUGH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MAFFETT v. EVANSVILLE POLICE DEPT. et al
as 3:2023cv00015
Plaintiff:
WILLIE G. MAFFETT
Defendant:
EVANSVILLE POLICE DEPT., SETH GORMAN, BROWN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Freeman v. Pickens et al
as 3:2023cv00105
Plaintiff:
Jerry Freeman
Defendant:
Deputy Matthew Pickens, Deputy Seth Barton, Unknown Deputy or Deputies of the Pulaski County Sheriff's Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Klaassen et al v. The Trustees of Indiana University
as 1:2021cv00238
Plaintiff:
MACEY POLICKA, ASHLEE MORRIS, JAIME CARINI and others
Defendant:
The Trustees of Indiana University
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Kellems v. Barton
as 3:2021cv00197
Defendant:
Seth Barton
Plaintiff:
Kathy Kellems
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00043
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 794
WANG et al v. CITY OF FISHERS POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 1:2019cv04042
Defendant:
SETH JOHNSON, DAVID BOHMEIER, JOHN DOE 7 and others
Plaintiff:
CHUEN HUA WANG, GUARDIAN CHUEN HUA WANG and TIAN HUEI WANG
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MILLER v. WALMART STORES, INC. et al
as 4:2019cv00001
Defendant:
CITY OF SEYMOUR, TROY VANOVER, SETH SAGE and others
Plaintiff:
JESSICA MILLER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
