Cases 1 - 10 of 337
BROWN v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2024cv01019
Plaintiff:
RA' SHEEN J BROWN
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, DISTRICT ATTORNEY SETH WILLIAMS, CAROLYN NAYLOR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Singh v. Vaughn
as 2:2023cv03415
Plaintiff:
Gagandeep Singh
Defendant:
Seth V Vaughn and Cameron T Vaughn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Singh v. Vaughn et al
as 5:2023cv03415
Plaintiff:
Gagandeep Singh
Defendant:
Cameron T Vaughn and Seth V Vaughn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
GOODLIN v. ROSE et al
as 2:2023cv02304
Plaintiff:
HERBERT SETH GOODLIN
Defendant:
ALEX ROSE, delaware county daily times, FOLCROFT BOROUGH DETECTIVE CORPORAL DANIEL E. WHITE, OFFICIALLY AND IN HIS INDIVIDUAL CAPACITY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
SMITH v. DET. RYAN MCCARTNEY'S SUPERVISOR et al
as 2:2023cv01456
Plaintiff:
CALVIN SMITH
Defendant:
DET. RYAN MCCARTNEY, JDG. D. ANHATT, PUBLIC DEFENDER MONIT ANDERSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BROOKS et al v. HILLSTROM et al
as 2:2023cv00950
Plaintiff:
Alexander Brooks and Steven Maslanik
Defendant:
Seth Hillstrom and Anthony Spina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
WHITEN v. COMMON WEALTH et al
as 2:2022cv05214
Plaintiff:
DURELL WHITEN and DURELL WHITE
Defendant:
COMMON WEALTH, CHARLES HAYDEN, JUDGE ROBERT P COLEMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PRUITT v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2022cv04772
Plaintiff:
LEROY PRUITT
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, FORMER DISTRICT OF PHILA. SETH WILLIAMS SUB NOM, LARRY KRASHER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MILLER v. AMERICAN ECONOMY INSURANCE COMPANY
as 5:2022cv03208
Plaintiff:
SETH MILLER
Defendant:
AMERICAN ECONOMY INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
