Cases 1 - 8 of 8
FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH CONTINUING LEGAL EDUCATION REQUIREMENTS, NONPAYMENT OF ATTORNEY REGISTRATION FEES, AND/OR FAILURE TO SUBMIT IOLTA CERTIFICATION
as 1:2017mc00040
Respondent:
MANISH SHAILESHKUMAR ANTANI, JONATHAN REECE ARMSTRONG, ROBERT LEE ARTHUR and others
Plaintiff:
VICTORIA ANN DEAK
In Re:
FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH CONTINUING LEGAL EDUCATION REQUIREMENTS, NONPAYMENT OF ATTORNEY REGISTRATION FEES, AND/OR FAILURE TO SUBMIT IOLTA CERTIFICATION
Defendant:
CASEY COLE KANNENBERG
Cunningham v. Prior et al
as 3:2016cv00480
Plaintiff:
Travis Cunningham
Defendant:
Randy Prior and Jessica Seward
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv01703
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act
IN RE: FAILURE TO COMPLY
as 1:2014mc00052
Respondent:
JONATHAN ROBERT ANDERSON, MAX WAYNE APPLE, JILL MICHELLE ARNOLD and others
In Re:
FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH CONTINUING LEGAL EDUCATION REQUIREMENTS, NONPAYMENT OF ATTORNEY REGISTRATION FEES, AND/OR FAILURE TO SUBMIT IOLTA CERTIFICATION
Seward v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 4:2013cv00018
Plaintiff:
Rodney A Seward
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Miscellaneous_party:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00268
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
SLOAN v. TOWN OF FISHERS, INDIANA et al
as 1:2011cv00773
Defendant:
LT. DAVID SEWARD, OFFICER BEN COLLING, OFFICER DAVID FINN and others
Plaintiff:
BRIAN A. SLOAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
STACER v. TOWN OF FISHERS et al
as 1:2009cv00104
Plaintiff:
GORDON K. STACER
Defendant:
TOWN OF FISHERS, TOWN OF FISHERS, FISHERS POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
