Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00805
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Digital Media Solutions, LLC v. South University of Ohio, LLC et al
as 1:2019cv00145
Defendant:
South University of Ohio, LLC, DCEH Education Holdings, LLC, DC South University of Ohio LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Digital Media Solutions, LLC
Intervenor Plaintiff:
Buncher Company, Stephanie Porreca, Historic Berriman-Morgan, LLC and others
Intervenor:
Benefit Administrative Systems, LLC, Thomas J Perrelli, U.S. Bank, National Association and others
Interested Party:
HEFCO Meadowbrook LLC, Store SPE 1200 Lincoln, LLC, 3601 Sunflower LLC and others
Receiver:
Mark E. Dottore
Petitioner:
Douglas Emmett 2010, llc
Amicus Curiae:
United States
Respondent:
Mark A. Kompa and FSP Pacific Center LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
MAHALIK v. CANTANIA et al
as 2:2018cv02073
Plaintiff:
BLAISE MAHALIK
Defendant:
LISA CANTANIA , SHANE KENNEDY and CANTANIA ENGINEERING
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
-CN Green, et al v. Johnson Richards &, et al
as 3:2000cv00770
Movant:
Eleanor Bankston, William C Bankston, Joe Bridges and others
Plaintiff:
Eleanor Bankston, William C Bankston, Joe Bridges and others
Defendant:
Central States Marketing, John Doe, Richard Fabulich and others
Notice Only:
Mrs. Bridget Benoit Denicola
Unknown:
Ross T. Elliott, David Parker, Ross T. Elliott and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
William Sung v. State of Nevada, et al
as 10-17903
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM KYITEH SUNG
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF NEVADA, STATE GAMING CONTROL BOARD, SHANE KENNEDY and others
Sung v. State Of Nevada et al
as 2:2010cv01607
Defendant:
Shane Kennedy, State Gaming Control Board, State Of Nevada and others
Plaintiff:
William Kyiteh Sung
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
