Cases 21 - 30 of 37
BAILEY v. GARDNER et al
as 1:2016cv00319
Plaintiff:
ROBERT GENE BAILEY
Defendant:
JOSEPH GARDNER, K. D. MACKEY, R. M. ASHLEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BAILEY v. GARDNER et al
as 1:2016cv00298
Plaintiff:
ROBERT GENE BAILEY
Defendant:
JOSEPH GARDNER, NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF MOTOR VEHICLES, EAL HOLDINGS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BAILEY v. GARDNER et al
as 1:2016cv00299
Plaintiff:
ROBERT GENE BAILEY
Defendant:
JOSEPH GARDNER, CARL L. BRITT, JR., D. J. DOOER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BAILEY v. GARDNER et al
as 1:2016cv00300
Plaintiff:
ROBERT GENE BAILEY
Defendant:
JOSEPH GARDNER, D. J. DOOER, J. HOOKS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BAILEY v. GARDNER et al
as 1:2016cv00292
Plaintiff:
ROBERT GENE BAILEY
Defendant:
JOSEPH GARDNER, ROBERT HICKS, CARL L. BRITT, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BAILEY v. GARDNER et al
as 1:2016cv00293
Plaintiff:
ROBERT GENE BAILEY
Defendant:
JOSEPH GARDNER, ERNESTINE R. WATSON, ROBERT HICKS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hogue et al v. White et al
as 1:2016cv00085
Plaintiff:
Brian Elliott Hogue, Gary A Butts, Gerald E Lind and others
Defendant:
Corizon Health Services, LLC, Beeken Petty O'Keefe & Company, PharmaCorr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harold Black v. Concordia Parish Rehab Center, et al
as 12-30688
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HAROLD JOE BLACK
Defendant - Appellee:
CONCORDIA PARISH REHAB CENTER & FACILITY II, RUSSELL BUTLER, RANDY MAXWELL and others
Williams v. Danberg et al
as 1:2011cv00262
Plaintiff:
Sherrhonda L. Williams
Defendant:
Carl Danberg, Thomas Carter, Michael Deloy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Billie Moss v. Rissie Owens, et al
as 10-10640
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BILLIE WAYNE MOSS
Defendant - Appellee:
RISSIE OWENS, Chairperson, Texas Board of Pardon and Paroles, SHARON BROWN, Parole Officer and CHARLES MORRIS, Parole Officer
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
