Cases 11 - 20 of 150
Conkle v. Shaw
as 4:2023cv00987
Plaintiff:
Christopher Conkle
Defendant:
Alan Shaw
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Conkle v. Shaw
as 2:2023cv01524
Plaintiff:
Christopher Conkle
Defendant:
Alan Shaw
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Turner v. Shaw et al
as 4:2023cv00870
Plaintiff:
Joshua Turner
Defendant:
Alan Shaw and Norfolk Southern Train Company
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FILING ERROR.
as 4:2023cv00854
Plaintiff:
Joshua Turner
Defendant:
Alan Shaw and Norfolk Southern Train Company
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Turner v. Shaw et al
as 2:2023cv01305
Plaintiff:
Joshua Turner
Defendant:
Alan Shaw and Norfolk Southern Train Company
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shaw v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 1:2023cv00620
Plaintiff:
Tommy Shaw
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Bucks County Employees Retirement System v. Norfolk Southern Corporation et al
as 2:2023cv00982
Plaintiff:
Bucks County Employees Retirement System
Defendant:
Norfolk Southern Corporation, Alan H. Shaw, James A. Squires and others
Petitioner:
AkademikerPension and Ironworkers Locals 40, 361 & 417 Union Annuity, Pension and Topping Out Funds
Shaw v. Wozniak et al
as 2:2023cv00942
Plaintiff:
Traci M. Shaw
Defendant:
Richard Wozniak and City of Columbus
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Shaw v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv04136
Plaintiff:
Kevin E. Shaw
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Elkins v. Franklin Medical Center, et al.
as 2:2022cv03705
Plaintiff:
David Elkins
Defendant:
Franklin Medical Center, Warden Pickaway Correctional Institution, Warden K. Jeter Pugh and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
