Cases 21 - 30 of 362
Johnson v. Shaw
as 3:2020cv00239
Defendant:
Frank Shaw
Petitioner:
Vadell Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Graham v. City of Cleveland, Mississippi et al
as 4:2018cv00004
Defendant:
Ladaster Green, Chief Charles Bingham, Ronnie Livingston and others
Plaintiff:
Kenyarda Graham
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Edwards v. Shaw et al
as 3:2020cv00297
Defendant:
Warden Frank Shaw and M.T.C.Private Corporation
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Plaintiff:
Anthony Jerome Edwards
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lee v. Chickasaw County Regional Correctional Facility et al
as 1:2020cv00118
Defendant:
Brand Hoffee, (Big Shaw) Nickname, Mr. Dallas and others
Plaintiff:
Sam W. Lee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Powell v. Shaw et al
as 3:2020cv00337
Defendant:
Warden Frank Shaw, MDOC, Major Christopher Dykes and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Plaintiff:
Broderick B. Powell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rawls v. Walls et al
as 3:2020cv00014
Defendant:
Cyathia Griffin, A. Green, Lavonne Walls and others
Plaintiff:
Stanley Ellis Rawls
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Chisholm v. Johnson et al
as 3:2019cv00929
Defendant:
J. Lamar Shaw, Cynthia Griffin, Deputy Warden Chaz White and others
Plaintiff:
Tony Dewayne Chisholm
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rawls v. Walls et al
as 3:2019cv00839
Defendant:
Cyathia Griffin, A. Green, Lavonne Walls and others
Plaintiff:
Stanley Ellis Rawls
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Baker v. Sheriff et al
as 3:2019cv00679
Plaintiff:
Richard Baker
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Defendant:
Warden Juventric Shaw and Sheriff Jacob Sheriff
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Davis v. Shaw
as 2:2019cv00150
Defendant:
Frank Shaw
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Davis
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
