Cases 1 - 10 of 24
ALEXANDER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv20090
Plaintiff:
SHAWN ALEXANDER
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
ALEXANDER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv14763
Plaintiff:
SHAWN ALEXANDER
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Simpson v. USA
as 4:2023cv00425
Petitioner:
Shawn Alexander Simpson
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
WILLIAMS v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv13897
Plaintiff:
SHAWN ALEXANDER WILLIAMS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
ALEXANDER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv37386
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
SHAWN ALEXANDER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
US v. Shawn Powell
as 20-6526
Defendant / Appellant:
SHAWN ALEXANDER POWELL, a/k/a Shaun Alexander Powell
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
JENSON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv22672
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
SHAWN ALEXANDER JENSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ALEXANDER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2020cv01602
Defendant:
AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and 3M COMPANY
Plaintiff:
SHAWN ALEXANDER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
POWELL v. ORTIZ et al
as 1:2020cv00593
Defendant:
DAVID E. ORTIZ, NICOLETTA TURNER-FOSTER and JEFF WILK
Plaintiff:
SHAWN ALEXANDER POWELL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Acevedo et al v. Intercontinental Terminals Company LLC
as 4:2019cv04051
Plaintiff:
Richard Anthony, H.C., a minor, Mandy Mace and others
Defendant:
Intercontinental Terminals Company LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
