Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Thomas v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2021cv02037
Plaintiff:
Shawn M Thomas
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
CSS-Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Shawn Thomas v. Chad Rogers
as 19-3878
Defendant / Appellee:
CHAD ROGERS
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SHAWN M. THOMAS
Thomas v. Slusher et al
as 1:2017cv00794
Plaintiff:
Shawn M. Thomas
Defendant:
Karen Slusher, Peter Burgos, Chris Adams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shawn Thomas v. Mahoning County Jail, et al
as 16-3495
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SHAWN M. THOMAS
Defendant - Appellee:
MAHONING COUNTY JAIL, In their official capacity, SHERIFF RANDALL A. WELLINGTON, LIEUTENANT STEVE SZEKLEY and others
Shawn Thomas v. Damon Hininger, et al
as 15-3547
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SHAWN M. THOMAS
Defendant - Appellee:
DAMON T. HININGER, In his individual and official capacity, CORRECTIONS CORPORATION OF AMERICA, In their individual and official capacity, BARRY GOODRICH, In his individual and official capacity and others
Shawn Thomas v. Damon Hininger, et al
as 15-3547
Defendant / Appellee:
MR. PONTARIO, In his individual and official capacity, CHRISTOPHER CHESTNUT, In his individual and official capacity, CORRECTIONS CORPORATION OF AMERICA, In their individual and official capacity and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SHAWN M. THOMAS
Thomas v. Hininger, et al
as 1:2014cv02127
Plaintiff:
Shawn M. Thomas
Defendant:
Damon T. Hininger, Corrections Corporation of America, Barry Goodrich and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas v. Mahoning County Jail et al
as 4:2013cv01469
Plaintiff:
Shawn M. Thomas
Defendant:
Mahoning County Jail, Randall A. Wellington, Steve Szekley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas v. DeBoo
as 5:2012cv00032
Plaintiff:
Shawn M. Thomas
Defendant:
Kuma J. DeBoo , Richard Heady and Eddie Anderson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
