Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Sweat v. The Grievance Committee et al
as 2:2023cv06420
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Shay Sweat
Defendant:
The Grievance Committee and Classification
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sweat v. Bright Heart et al
as 2:2023cv06419
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Shay Sweat
Defendant:
Bright Heart, Pipins and Captain
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bryant v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 6:2023cv03296
Plaintiff:
Mariesa Shay Bryant
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Interested Party:
Social Security Administrative Record and US Attorney - Social Security Noticing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Shay et al v. 3M Company, The et al
as 2:2022cv02493
Defendant:
3M Company, The, DuPont de Nemours Inc, Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Shay and Lisa Shay
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Sweat v. South Carolina
as 2:2022cv01865
Petitioner:
Jeremy Shay Sweat
Respondent:
South Carolina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sweat v. Roberts et al
as 2:2022cv00009
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Shay Sweat
Defendant:
Mrs. Beulah G. Roberts and Office of the Clerk of Court of Clarendon County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv03995
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Sweat v. Evans Correctional Institution
as 2:2020cv04333
Defendant:
Evans Correctional Institution
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Shay Sweat
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nesbitt v. Cumpagna et al
as 0:2020cv04193
Defendant:
Mr. M. Chartier, Sergeant Francis, Capt. Pendergrass and others
Plaintiff:
Brian Keith Nesbitt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
David v. Savage
as 2:2019cv03139
Defendant:
Andrew J Savage, III, Andy Savage and Savage Law Firm PA, The
Plaintiff:
Shai David
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
