Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Grimes v. Wats et al
as 1:2023cv00581
Plaintiff:
Matthew James Grimes
Defendant:
Katrina Wats, Shell Point Mortgage, Joe McSherry and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv02188
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Fair Credit Reporti
Stewart v. Ditech Financial LLC et al
as 1:2021cv11992
Plaintiff:
Michael Stewart
Defendant:
Ditech Financial LLC, Erin Semcken, Shell Point Mortgage Servicing and others
Arthur Harris v. New Rez LLC, et al
as 20-35951
Defendant / Appellee:
DITECH LLC, SHELL POINT MORTGAGE COMPANY and NEW REZ LLC
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ARTHUR HARRIS
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv01052
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1334
Davis v. Bank of America Mortgage Servicer et al
as 8:2019cv01582
Defendant:
Resurgent Mortgage Servicer, Shell Point Mortgage Servicers, Bank of America Mortgage Servicer and others
Plaintiff:
James Bernard Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1471
TYREE v. DITECH FINANCIAL, LLC et al
as 1:2019mc00015
Respondent:
DITECH FINANCIAL, LLC, MCCALLA RAYMER LEIBERT PIERCE, LLC, SHELL POINT MORTGAGE SERVICING and others
Petitioner:
RUTHA TYREE
TYREE v. DITECH FINANCIAL, LLC et al
as 1:2019mc00014
Respondent:
DITECH FINANCIAL, LLC, MCCALLA RAYMER LEIBERT PIERCE, LLC, SHELL POINT MORTGAGE SERVICING and others
Petitioner:
RUTHA TYREE
CADOCHE v. BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON et al
as 1:2018cv01699
Defendant:
THOMAS A. ADAMS, BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON, NORMAN ST. GEORGE and others
Plaintiff:
GALIQUOGI' DINAH DEAS CADOCHE and BRIDGETTE CHAPMAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2018cv02037
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
