Cases 21 - 30 of 53
Okler v. MCC IMU Prison et al
as 3:2018cv05458
Plaintiff:
Michael Craig Okler
Defendant:
MCC IMU Prison, Washington State DOC, Shelton Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Alexander et al v. Miller et al
as 4:2018cv05057
Plaintiff:
Linda M Alexander, Michael G Alexander and Raymond C Alexander-Killinger
Defendant:
Andrew Miller, Jerome Devlin, Chris Skinner and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2017cv05168
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Trustee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Shelton Brothers Inc. v. Vinum Wine Importers & Distributors, LLC
as 2:2017cv01378
Plaintiff:
Shelton Brothers Inc
Defendant:
Vinum Wine Importers & Distributors LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Shelton v. Berryhill
as 2:2017cv01324
Plaintiff:
Stephen Shelton
Defendant:
Nancy A Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Smallwood v. Flygare et al
as 2:2017cv01179
Plaintiff:
Shelton D. Smallwood
Defendant:
Mary Beth Flygare, Richard Morgan and Bernad Warner, M.D.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Heimbigner v. City of Shelton et al
as 3:2017cv05549
Plaintiff:
Steven R Heimbigner
Defendant:
City of Shelton and Christopher Kostad
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Lopez v. Marosco et al
as 2:2017cv00735
Plaintiff:
Alexander Louie Lopez
Defendant:
Marosco, Anderson, Chupa and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jordan v. Spokane County Detention Services et al
as 2:2017cv00089
Plaintiff:
Justin Robert Jordan
Defendant:
Spokane County Detention Services, Shelton Corrections Receiving Center, Airway Heights Correction Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. City of Shelton, et al
as 3:2016cv05944
Plaintiff:
Steven Smith
Defendant:
Robert Auderer and City of Shelton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
