Cases 11 - 20 of 21
Lin v. Sunny on 3rd, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv05927
Plaintiff:
Jie Sheng Lin
Defendant:
Sunny on 3rd, Inc. , Yam Sin and Suiping Zhuang
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Lin v. Holder
as 12-2037
Petitioner:
Ke Sheng Lin
Respondent:
Eric H. Holder, Jr., United States Attorney General
Lin v. Holder
as 12-1449
Petitioner:
Chang Sheng Lin
Respondent:
Eric H. Holder, Jr., United States Attorney General
Lin et al v. Eddie's Taco & Grill Plus, Inc. et al
as 1:2011cv06317
Plaintiff:
Dong Sheng Lin and Ni Lin
Defendant:
Eddie's Taco & Grill Plus, Inc. and Chong Chio
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Lin v. Holder
as 11-2355
Petitioner:
Ji Sheng Lin
Respondent:
Eric H. Holder, Jr., United States Attorney General
Lin v. Holder
as 10-4740
Petitioner:
Ming Sheng Lin
Respondent:
Eric H. Holder, Jr., United States Attorney General
Lin v. Brown
as 9:2010cv00705
Petitioner:
Mao Sheng Lin
Respondent:
William D. Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
FTC v. Inc21.com Corporation, et al
as 10-15608
Plaintiff - Appellee:
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
Defendant - Appellant:
INC21.COM CORPORATION, DBA INC21, DBA Inc21.net, DBA Inc21 Communications, DBA GlobalYP, DBA NetOpus, DBA Metro YP, DBA Jumpage Solutions, DBA GoFaxer.com, DBA FaxFaster.com, JUMPAGE SOLUTIONS INCORPORATED, GST U.S.A., INC. and others
Defendant:
SHENG LIN
Third-party-defendant - Appellee:
PACIFIC BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY
Federal Trade Commission v. Inc21.com Corporation et al
as 3:2010cv00022
Plaintiff:
Federal Trade Commission, Federal Trade Commission and Federal Trade Commission
Defendant:
Inc21.com Corporation, Jumpage Solutions Incorporated, GST U.S.A., Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0045 Federal Trade Commission Act
Lin v. Conway
as 9:2009cv00815
Petitioner:
Mao Sheng Lin
Respondent:
James Conway
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
