Cases 11 - 20 of 38
Cottman v. Well Path et al
as 9:2020cv03075
Defendant:
Doctor or Nurse, Sheriff Al Cannon, Well Path and others
Plaintiff:
Howard Cottman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carrillo et al v. Well Path et al
as 9:2020cv02790
Defendant:
Doctor or Nurse, Sheriff Al Cannon, Well Path and others
Plaintiff:
Howard Cottman and Joseph A Carrillo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McCullum v. Cannon et al
as 1:2020cv01075
Defendant:
Nurse Woods, Sheriff Al Cannon, Unknowed Defendant and others
Plaintiff:
Jaquell Antonio McCullum
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Hartnett v. The State et al
as 9:2020cv00196
Defendant:
Sheriff Al Cannon Detention Center and The State
Plaintiff:
Paul A. Hartnett, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Delay v. Sheriff Al Cannon Detention Center
as 4:2019cv03589
Defendant:
Sheriff Al Cannon Detention Center
Plaintiff:
Derek Michael Delay
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brayint El v. Officer Fornandes et al
as 2:2019cv03045
Defendant:
Sheriff Al Cannon and Officer Fornandes
Plaintiff:
Bulus Kurnil Brayin El and Bulus Kurnil Brayint El
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Sherlock v. Sheriff Al Cannon Detention Center et al
as 5:2019cv01633
Defendant:
Sheriff Al Cannon Detention Center and Aramark
Plaintiff:
Michael William Sherlock
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Whitfield v. Cannon et al
as 6:2019cv01354
Petitioner:
Divine Naquann Whitfield and Shawn Sinclair
Respondent:
Sheriff Al Cannon and Charleston County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Whitfield v. Cannon
as 6:2019cv01353
Petitioner:
Divine Naquann Whitfield and Shawn Sinclair
Respondent:
Sheriff Al Cannon and Charleston County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Smith v. Charleston County et al
as 9:2019cv00967
Defendant:
Sheriff Al Cannon Detention Center, Charleston County, Cpt. Carter and others
Plaintiff:
Shannon Maurice Smith, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
