Cases 1 - 10 of 32
Lamont Garner Karriem v. County of Los Angeles et al
as 2:2020cv07734
Defendant:
Los Angeles County Sheriffs Department, Deputy Steve Arens, Ret. Sheriff Jim McDonnell and others
Plaintiff:
Lamont Garner Karriem
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv10376
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
William Robert Bramscher v. State of California et al
as 5:2018cv02328
Defendant:
Sheriff John McMahon, State of California and Sheriff Jim McDonnell
Plaintiff:
William Robert Bramscher
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lamont Tarkington v. County of Los Angeles et al
as 2:2018cv07636
Defendant:
Sheriff Jim McDonnell, James Murren, Donald Young and others
Plaintiff:
LaMont Tarkington
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sheldon Lockett et al v. County of Los Angeles, et al
as 2:2018cv05838
Defendant:
Mizrain Orrego, Sheriff Jim McDonnell, Samuel Aldama and others
Plaintiff:
Michelle Davis, Clyde Davis and Sheldon Lockett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Joe Alfred Taylor v. Jim McDonnell
as 2:2018cv05427
Respondent:
Sheriff Jim McDonnell
Petitioner:
Joe Alfred Taylor, III
Donovan Lamonte Haley et al v. LASD et al
as 2:2018cv03107
Defendant:
Guerrero, LASD, Sheriff Jim McDonnell and others
Plaintiff:
Donovan Lamonte Haley
Scott York v. Los Angeles County Sheriffs Department Sheriff Jim McDonnell et al
as 2:2018cv02815
Defendant:
Does, Dr. Rick Jenkins, Los Angeles County Sheriffs Department Sheriff Jim McDonnell and others
Plaintiff:
Scott York
Nelson Romero v. Jim McDonnell et al
as 5:2017cv01830
Defendant:
City of Lynwood, Dan Holguin, Sheriff Jim McDonnell and others
Plaintiff:
Nelson Romero
Laurack D. Bray v. Superior Court of California et al
as 2:2017cv06289
Plaintiff:
Laurack D. Bray
Defendant:
Taui Cantil-Sakanye, Sheriff Jim McDonnell and Superior Court of California
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
