Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Hamm v. Dooley et al
as 3:2020cv01648
Defendant:
Colley Ainsworth, Taylor Moore, Sheriffs Office Ouachita Parish and others
Plaintiff:
Dylan Shane Hamm
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Richardson v. U S Federal Bureau of Investigations et al
as 3:2020cv01050
Defendant:
Police Dept City of Monroe, U S Federal Bureau of Investigations, 4th Judicial District Court and others
Plaintiff:
Clifton James Richardson, Sr
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 0922
Harris v. Ouachita Parish et al
as 3:2018cv00606
Plaintiff:
Michael D Harris
Defendant:
Sheriffs Dept Ouachita Parish, Jay Russell and Nathaniel Dean
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Sheriffs Dept Ouachita Parish, et al
as 3:2017cv00060
Plaintiff:
Daniel Williams
Defendant:
Sheriffs Dept Ouachita Parish, Seth Cox, Jay Russell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Alexander v. Gilley et al
as 3:2015cv02732
Plaintiff:
Matthew Edward Alexander
Defendant:
Gary Gilley, Miranda Rogers and Sheriffs Dept Ouachita Parish
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson v. Russell et al
as 3:2013cv03112
Plaintiff:
Willie C Jackson
Defendant:
Jay Russell, Sheriffs Dept Ouachita Parish, Doug Campbell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Muse v. Ouachita Parish et al
as 3:2009cv02230
Plaintiff:
William A Muse
Defendant:
Sheriffs Dept Ouachita Parish, Royce Toney, Jay Russell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stanley v. Ouachita Correctional Center et al
as 3:2009cv00863
Plaintiff:
Bryan Stanley
Defendant:
Ouachita Correctional Center, Royce Toney, Medical Staff of Ouachita Correctional Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Swan v. Fewell et al
as 3:2007cv00693
Plaintiff:
Melanie Swan
Defendant:
Richard Fewell, Kenneth Cloud, Ronnie Stewart and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
