Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Porterfield v. Saul
as 4:2020cv01443
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul
Plaintiff:
Sherril Porterfield
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Long v. Conlee et al
as 4:2015cv00086
Plaintiff:
Anthony Edward Long
Defendant:
Ken Conlee, Sherrill Rosen, R Swan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mathes et al v. Ethicon,Inc. et al
as 4:2014cv01668
Plaintiff:
Kathy Mathes , Ramona Duby , Audrey Edwards and others
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. , Johnson & Johnson , American Medical Systems, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Taylor et al v. Fresenius Medical Care North America, Inc. et al
as 4:2014cv00980
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Taylor , Christopher Gavazzi , Cheryl Shelton and others
Defendant:
Fresenius Medical Care North America, Inc., Fresenius USA, Inc. , Fresenius Medical Care Holdings, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Brinkley v. Roberts et al
as 4:2012cv01045
Plaintiff:
John Brinkley
Defendant:
Sherrill Page Roberts, Molly Jane Lauber and Tom McGiffin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Greene v. Organon USA, Inc. et al
as 4:2012cv01230
Plaintiff:
Monica Greene
Defendant:
Organon USA, Inc. , N.V. Organon , Merck & Co. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2009cv02004
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Burke v. Roberts et al
as 4:2007cv00739
Plaintiff:
Martin E. Burke
Defendant:
Sherrill Roberts and Molly Lauber
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Banks v. AmerenUE et al
as 4:2007cv01254
Defendant:
Craig Sherrill and AmerenUE
Plaintiff:
Norman Banks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2007cv00009
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
