Cases 11 - 20 of 23
Galbraith v. LeBlanc, et al
as 3:2017cv00486
Plaintiff:
Samuel Galbraith
Defendant:
James LeBlanc and Sheryl Ranatza
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bentel v. LeBlanc et al
as 3:2017cv00382
Plaintiff:
Anthony Bentel
Defendant:
Brennan Kelsey, James Kuhn, James M. LeBlanc and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Thompson v. Ranatza
as 3:2017cv00235
Defendant:
Sheryl Ranatza
Plaintiff:
Johnny Thompson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brooks v. Ranatza et al
as 3:2017cv00117
Petitioner:
Donald Brooks
Respondent:
Jeff Landry, James LeBlanc and Sheryl Ranatza
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smith v. Ranatza
as 3:2016cv00279
Defendant:
Sheryl Ranatza
Plaintiff:
Adam Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pierce v. Ranatza et al
as 3:2015cv00590
Plaintiff:
Emile Pierce
Defendant:
Jenie Powers and Sheryl Ranatza
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Evans v. LeBlanc et al
as 5:2015cv02087
Plaintiff:
Eddie Gene Evans
Defendant:
James M LeBlanc, Burl Cain, Barry Matheney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Francis v. LeBlanc et al
as 3:2015cv00411
Plaintiff:
Jerry Paul Francis
Defendant:
James LeBlanc and Sheryl Ranatza
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Preston Demouchette, Jr. v. James LeBlanc, et al
as 14-31254
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PRESTON G. DEMOUCHETTE
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES M. LEBLANC, SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY AND CORRECTIONS, SHERYL RANATZA, Chairperson, TESSIE COOLEY, A.R.D.C. - L.S.P. and others
Demouchette v. LeBlanc et al
as 3:2014cv00370
Defendant:
Tessie Cooley, James LeBlanc, Sheryl Ranatza and others
Plaintiff:
Preston G Demouchette, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
