Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Garcia-Menocal et al v. McCarty Corporation et al
as 2:2020cv01007
Defendant:
Lamorak Insurance Company, Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's London, Gardner Denver, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Ignacio Jesus Garcia-Menocal, Ignacio Jose Garcia-Menocal, Victor Gustavo Garcia-Menocal and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
RADTKE et al v. U.S. BUREAU OF CUSTOMS & BORDER PROTECTION et al
as 1:2017cv02412
Plaintiff:
CAPTAIN PAUL RADTKE , OFFSHORE MARINE SERVICE ASSOCIATION and SHIPBUILDERS COUNCIL OF AMERICA
Defendant:
U.S. BUREAU OF CUSTOMS & BORDER PROTECTION and KEVIN K. MCALEENAN
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706
Shipbuilders Council v. OSHA
as 11-1676
Petitioner:
SHIPBUILDERS COUNCIL OF AMERICA, INCORPORATED
Respondent:
HILDA L. SOLIS, Secretary, United States Department of Labor and OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY & HEALTH ADMINISTRATION
Shipbuilders Council of Americ v. United States Coast Guard
as 09-1070
Plaintiff - Appellee:
SHIPBUILDERS COUNCIL OF AMERICA, INCORPORATED, CROWLEY MARITIME CORPORATION and OVERSEAS SHIPHOLDING GROUP, INCORPORATED
Defendant:
UNITED STATES COAST GUARD, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY and NATIONAL VESSEL DOCUMENTATION CENTER
Intervenor/Defendant - None:
US SHIPPING PARTNERS LLP
Intervenor/Defendant - Appellant:
SEABULK PETROLEUM TRANSPORT, INCORPORATED and SEABULK ENERGY TRANSPORT, INCORPORATED
Shipbuilders Council of America, Inc. et al v. United States Department of Homeland Security et al
as 1:2008cv00680
Plaintiff:
Shipbuilders Council of America, Inc., Crowley Maritime Corp. and Overseas Shipholding Group, Inc.
Defendant:
United States Department of Homeland Security, United States Coast Guard and National Vessel Documentation Center
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Shipbuilders Council of Americ v. United States Department of Ho
as 08-1702
Plaintiff - Appellee:
SHIPBUILDERS COUNCIL OF AMERICA, INCORPORATED, CROWLEY MARITIME CORPORATION and OVERSEAS SHIPHOLDING GROUP, INCORPORATED
Defendant - Appellant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, UNITED STATES COAST GUARD and NATIONAL VESSEL DOCUMENTATION CENTER
Intervenor/Defendant:
SEABULK ENERGY TRANSPORT, INCORPORATED and SEABULK PETROLEUM TRANSPORT, INCORPORATED
Intervenor/Defendant - None:
US SHIPPING PARTNERS LLP
Amicus Supporting Appellant:
MATSON NAVIGATION COMPANY, INCORPORATED
Shipbuilders Council of Americ v. United States Coast Guard
as 08-1546
Plaintiff - Appellee:
SHIPBUILDERS COUNCIL OF AMERICA, INCORPORATED, CROWLEY MARITIME CORPORATION and OVERSEAS SHIPHOLDING GROUP, INCORPORATED
Defendant - Appellant:
UNITED STATES COAST GUARD, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY and NATIONAL VESSEL DOCUMENTATION CENTER
Intervenor/Defendant - None:
US SHIPPING PARTNERS LLP
Intervenor/Defendant - Appellant:
SEABULK PETROLEUM TRANSPORT, INCORPORATED and SEABULK ENERGY TRANSPORT, INCORPORATED
Amicus Supporting Appellant:
MATSON NAVIGATION COMPANY, INCORPORATED
Shipbuilders Council of America, Inc. et al v. U.S. Department of Homeland Security et al
as 1:2007cv01234
Plaintiff:
Shipbuilders Council of America, Inc. and Pasha Hawaii Transport Lines LLC
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Homeland Security, U.S. Coast Guard and National Vessel Documentation Center
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706 Judicial Review of Agency Action
Shipbuilders Council of America, Inc. et al v. United States Department of Homeland Security et al
as 1:2007cv00665
Plaintiff:
Shipbuilders Council of America, Inc. , Crowley Maritime Corp. and Overseas Shipholding Group, Inc.
Defendant:
United States Department of Homeland Security , United States Coast Guard and National Vessel Documentation Center
Intervenor_defendant:
Seabulk Petroleum Transport, Inc. , Seabulk Energy Transport, Inc. and US Shipping Partners LLP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
SL SERVICE V US
as 03-1174
Amicus Curiae:
SHIPBUILDERS COUNCIL OF AMERICA, INC.
Plaintiff-Appellee:
SL SERVICE, INC.
Defendant-Appellant:
UNITED STATES
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
