Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Shipman v. Somerset County (MD) et al
as 1:2023cv03046
Plaintiff:
Dennis Shipman
Defendant:
Somerset County (MD), Somerset Department of Technical and Community Services and Kirk Simpkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act - Civil Action for Deprivation of Rights
Shipman v. Somerset County (MD) et al
as 1:2022cv03111
Plaintiff:
Dennis Shipman
Defendant:
Somerset County (MD), Somerset County Department of Technical & Community Services (MD), Kirk Simpkins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act - Civil Action for Deprivation of Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv02784
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Shipman v. Smith et al
as 1:2013cv03929
Plaintiff:
Dennis Shipman
Defendant:
Arlene Smith, Jr. and Carolyn W Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 427
Shipman v. Williams et al
as 1:2013cv03080
Plaintiff:
Dennis Shipman
Defendant:
Alexandria Nichols Williams, Ben C. Clyburn, Leo Ryan, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shipman v. Flowers
as 1:2013cv00423
Plaintiff:
Dennis Shipman
Defendant:
George Flowers, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Shipman v. Central Transport LLC
as 1:2013cv00394
Plaintiff:
Dennis Shipman
Defendant:
Central Transport LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Non-Motor Vehicle
Shipman v. Sammons et al
as 1:2013cv00398
Plaintiff:
Dennis Shipman
Defendant:
Mark D. Sammons and Thomas J. Hogan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Shipman v. Earl's Tire Sales Inc.
as 1:2013cv00395
Plaintiff:
Dennis Shipman
Defendant:
Earl's Tire Sales Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Shipman v. Baltimore Police Department et al
as 1:2013cv00396
Plaintiff:
Dennis Shipman
Defendant:
Baltimore Police Department, Mark A. Grimes, James H. Green and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
