Cases 21 - 30 of 104
PETTAWAY v. WETZEL et al
as 1:2019cv00099
Defendant:
JOHN E. WETZEL and SHIRLEY MOORE SMEAL
Plaintiff:
WAYNE PETTAWAY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Tunsil v. Wolf et al
as 1:2019cv00386
Defendant:
D.O.C. Secre. John E. Wetzel, Governor Thomas Wolf and D.O.C. Dpty. Secre. Shirley Moore-Smeal
Plaintiff:
Barrett S. Tunsil
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lane et al v. Wetzel et al
as 1:2019cv00075
Defendant:
Michael Wenerowicz, Caleb Younker, Kenneth Goodman and others
Plaintiff:
Ivan White and Carlton Lane
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pennsylvania Institutional Law Project et al v. Wetzel et al
as 1:2018cv02100
Plaintiff:
Abolitionist Law Center, Civil Liberties Union of Pennsylvania, Pennsylvania Institutional Law Project and others
Defendant:
Shirley Moore Smeal, Tabb Bickell, John E. Wetzel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hayes v. Wetzel et al
as 1:2018cv02099
Plaintiff:
Davon R. Hayes
Defendant:
John E. Wetzel, Tabb Bickell, Shirley Moore Smeal and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KOLLOCK v. BEEMER et al
as 3:2018cv00208
Respondent:
JOHN E. TUTTLE, ALAN ROBINSON, JOHN E. WETZEL and others
Petitioner:
JASON P. KOLLOCK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
CRISPELL v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2018cv01063
Defendant:
ROBERT GILMORE, TREVOR WINGARD, MICHAEL ZAKEN and others
Plaintiff:
DANIEL L. CRISPELL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
WOODELL v. PA. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AT GRATERFORD et al
as 2:2018cv01098
Plaintiff:
RANCOURT WOODELL
Defendant:
MIKE WENEROWICZ, JAY LANE, G. GALINSKI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moody v. Wetzel et al
as 3:2018cv00053
Plaintiff:
Brandon Moody
Defendant:
John Wetzel, Shirley Moore-Smeal, Michael Wenerowicz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HALL v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2017cv04738
Plaintiff:
DARRICK U. HALL
Defendant:
JOHN E. WETZEL , SHIRLEY MOORE-SMEAL , MICHAEL WENEROWICZ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
