Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Quigley v. Williams et al
as 3:2018cv01323
Defendant:
Steven K. Nord, Robert C. Chambers, Alex Vence and others
Plaintiff:
Harry Lawrence Quigley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shockley v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv04403
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Shockley
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Shockley et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc.
as 2:2017cv00887
Plaintiff:
Kathy Shockley and Jeff Shockley
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Harris v. Q & A Associates, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv00046
Plaintiff:
Friedrichs Harris
Defendant:
Q & A Associates, Inc. , Angela Shockley , Keith Bishop and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Shockley v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2015cv10534
Plaintiff:
Celia Shockley
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Moses et al v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 2:2013cv32974
Plaintiff:
Megan Moses , Michelle Dishon , Janet Hedges and others
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson, Ethicon, Inc. , Ethicon, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Shockley v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv25196
Plaintiff:
Mona D. Shockley
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Shockley et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv21737
Plaintiff:
Rena Shockley and Gary Shockley
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon, LLC and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Shockley et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv21247
Plaintiff:
Jeanne Shockley and Raymond Shockley
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon, LLC and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Shockley et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv20169
Plaintiff:
Connie Lynn Shockley and Bruce D. Shockley
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon, LLC and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
