Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00018
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Cecil v. Woodward et al
as 1:2019cv00024
Defendant:
DeWitt Cooper, Missy Woodward and Christopher Shortridge
Plaintiff:
Edwinna Donnell Cecil
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gordon v. Mullins et al
as 7:2012cv00494
Defendant:
D. Ball, Officer Barter, Bray and others
Plaintiff:
Carl D. Gordon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McLean v. Kiser et al
as 7:2012cv00495
Defendant:
Mr. Brock, Mr. Diets, Mr. Kiser and others
Plaintiff:
Quentin McLean
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Howard v. Pleasant et al
as 7:2012cv00321
Defendant:
M. Addington, Rebel Deel, C. Gilbert and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Pharaoh Howard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McNeal v. Hill Enterprises Inc. et al
as 3:2012cv00474
Plaintiff:
Michael McNeal
Defendant:
Hill Enterprises Inc. , Douglas Wayne Hill and Gary Shortridge
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 0327
McLean v. Ratliff et al
as 7:2012cv00227
Defendant:
Mr. Adams, Mr. Brown, Mr. Kiser and others
Plaintiff:
Quentin McLean
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gholson v. Commonwealth Of Virginia et al
as 7:2011cv00371
Defendant:
Sgt. Anthony Adam, George Allen, Ronald Angelone and others
Plaintiff:
Lonnie McDonovan Gholson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lovings v. Ray et al
as 7:2011cv00325
Respondent:
K. Edwards, John M. Jabe, L. Mullins and others
Petitioner:
Paul A. Lovings
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lovings v. Ray et al
as 7:2011cv00292
Respondent:
Mrs. K. Edwards, John S. Garman, John M. Jabe and others
Petitioner:
Paul A. Lovings
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
