Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Sierra-Lopez, David v. Brook
as 3:2022cv00502
Plaintiff:
David E. Sierra-Lopez
Defendant:
Correctional Officer Brook
Not Classified By Court:
CCI Prison Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sierra-Lopez, David v. Brook
as 3:2021cv00624
Plaintiff:
David E. Sierra-Lopez
Defendant:
Correctional Officer Brook
Not Classified By Court:
CCI Prison Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
David Sierra-Lopez v. Larry Fuchs
as 21-2473
Petitioner / Appellant:
DAVID SIERRA-LOPEZ
Respondent / Appellee:
LARRY FUCHS
Sierra-Lopez, David v. Fuchs, Larry
as 3:2021cv00363
Not Classified By Court:
CCI Prison Facility
Respondent:
Larry Fuchs
Petitioner:
David E. Sierra-Lopez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv01622
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
David Sierra-Lopez v. Tony Evers, et al
as 20-2139
Defendant / Appellee:
KEVIN A. CARR, TONY EVERS and SUSAN NOVAK, Warden
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID SIERRA-LOPEZ
Sierra-Lopez v. Pagels et al
as 2:2020cv00305
Plaintiff:
Kevin Sierra-Lopez
Defendant:
Nurse Pagels, Correct Care Solutions and Brown County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sierra-Lopez, Kevin v. Mink, Angela et al
as 3:2019cv00020
Defendant:
Michael Kemerling, Mary Taylor, Craig Tom and others
Undetermined:
WSPF Prison Facility
Plaintiff:
Kevin E. Sierra-Lopez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sierra-Lopez, David v. Walker, Scott et al
as 3:2018cv00665
Defendant:
John Doe (1), John Doe (6), Lucas Weber and others
Plaintiff:
David E. Sierra-Lopez
Undetermined:
CCI Prison Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sierra-Lopez, David et al v. Director/Commissioner of the State of WI et al
as 3:2018cv00060
Plaintiff:
David E. Sierra-Lopez
Defendant:
Director/Commissioner of the State of WI and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
