Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv08919
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
United Stats of America v. Two Cartons of Rifle Sights
as 5:2021cv00708
Defendant:
Two Cartons of Rifle Sights
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 19 U.S.C. § 1305
Jessica Montoya et al v. Sights on Service, Inc. et al
as 5:2019cv02334
Defendant:
DOES 1 through 100, inclusive, Sights on Service, Inc., dba Secret Shopper, Sights on Service, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Jessica Montoya
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
ELT Sight, Inc. et al v. EyeLight, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv05545
Plaintiff:
ELT SIGHT, INC. and ELLIOT FRIEDMAN
3Rd Party Plaintiff:
EYELIGHT, INC. and Michael S. Berlin
3Rd Party Defendant:
Marcus Enders, Johanes Junger, Axel Werbach and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145
e.Digital Corporation v. ShenZhen Gospell Smarthome Electronic Co., Ltd. et al
as 3:2015cv00691
Plaintiff:
e.Digital Corporation
Defendant:
ShenZhen Gospell Smarthome Electronic Co., Ltd., Ivideon LLC, Global Innovations, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126
Roosevelt Hotel, LLC et al v. City of Los Angeles et al
as 2:2009cv03068
Plaintiff:
Roosevelt Hotel, LLC, Roosevelt Hotel, LLC, In Plain Sight Media, Inc. and others
Defendant:
City of Los Angeles, City of Los Angeles, Community Redevelopment Agency of the City of Los Angeles and others
Counter Claimant:
City of Los Angeles and City of Los Angeles
Counter Defendant:
Roosevelt Hotel, LLC, In Plain Sight Media, Inc. and Does 1 through 10
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
In Plain Sight Media Inc v. William H Jackson et al
as 2:2007cv01739
Plaintiff:
In Plain Sight Media Inc, In Plain Sight Media Inc, In Plain Sight Media Inc and others
Defendant:
William H Jackson, William H Jackson, William H Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
