Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Hoff et al v. AVCO Corporation et al
as 3:2023cv01315
Defendant:
CNA Holdings, LLC, Cooper Industries, LLC, DCO, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Raymond A. Hoff and Nancy B. Hoff
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Tricoci v. Blackman et al
as 1:2022cv05445
Plaintiff:
Vincenzo Tricoci
Defendant:
Daniel Blackman, Star No. 7954, Michael Martinez, Johnny Santiago and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Hardy v. Brogsdale et al
as 1:2022cv04306
Plaintiff:
Tashun Hardy
Defendant:
Malcolm BROGSDALE, Rebecca Gierut, Jeffrey Cepeda and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Saunders v. DuPage County Jail et al
as 1:2020cv05477
Plaintiff:
Devonte Saunders
Defendant:
Homa, Gustatson, Lynch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Spring (U.S.A.) Corporation v. Sikorski
as 1:2018cv08543
Plaintiff:
Spring (U.S.A.) Corporation
Defendant:
Andrea Sikorski
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv04788
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
United States of America v. Sikorski
as 1:2016cv06538
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
John P Sikorski
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Kelleher v. Boeing Company, et al
as 3:2015cv00893
Defendant:
Beazer East, Inc., CBS Corporation, Industrial Holdings Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Thomas Kelleher
Cross Defendant:
Sprinkmann Insulation Inc., United Technologies Corporation and Rohr Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Diaz v. Chicago et al
as 1:2015cv05147
Plaintiff:
David Diaz
Defendant:
City of Chicago, Anthony Martin, Officer Sikorski and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Sikorski, v. Carolyn W. Colvin
as 1:2015cv02178
Plaintiff:
Sandra Sikorski
Defendant:
Carolyn Colvin and Service List
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
