Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Norfolk Southern Railway Company v. Baker Hughes Oilfield Operations LLC, et al
as 22-3710
Plaintiff / Appellee:
NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY
Defendant / Appellant:
BAKER HUGHES OILFIELD OPERATIONS LLC, fka Baker Hughes Oilfield Operations, Inc.
Appellee:
SILVER CREEK SERVICES, INC. and SILVER LINE LOGISTICS, INC.
DL KING TRANSPORT, LLC v. SILVER CREEK SERVICES, INC.
as 2:2019cv00741
Plaintiff:
DL KING TRANSPORT, LLC
Defendant:
SILVER CREEK SERVICES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330
Water Science Technologies LLC v. Silver Creek Services Inc
as 2:2019cv00256
Defendant:
Silver Creek Services Inc
Plaintiff:
Water Science Technologies LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY v. SILVER CREEK SERVICES, INC.
as 2:2017cv01016
Plaintiff:
NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY
Defendant:
SILVER CREEK SERVICES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1337
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv00627
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Downhole Technology LLC v. Silver Creek Services Inc. et al
as 4:2017cv00020
Plaintiff:
Downhole Technology LLC
Defendant:
Silver Creek Services Inc., StormField Innovative Technologies, LLC, Daniel R. Coffee and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Downhole Technology LLC v. Silver Creek Services Inc. et al
as 4:2016cv00823
Plaintiff:
Downhole Technology LLC
Defendant:
Silver Creek Services Inc., StormField Innovative Technologies, LLC, Michael Didier and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
BENNETT v. SILVER CREEK SERVICES, INC.
as 1:2015cv00273
Plaintiff:
TODD BENNETT
Defendant:
SILVER CREEK SERVICES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Carter v. Silver Creek Services Inc et al
as 3:2015cv01661
Defendant:
Silver Creek Services Inc and Silver Line Logistics Inc
Plaintiff:
Jeff L Carter
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
