Cases 1 - 10 of 45
Phillips v. Coffee County, Tennessee et al
as 4:2024cv00001
Plaintiff:
Justin Phillips
Defendant:
Coffee County, Tennessee, Steven Austin Qualls, Blake Simmons and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Simmons v. Vantell (PSLC2)
as 3:2023cv00136
Petitioner:
Lavonte Dominique Simmons
Respondent:
Vincent Vantell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Simmons v. Vantell
as 3:2023mc00008
Petitioner:
Lavonte Dominique Simmons
Respondent:
Vincent Vantell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ellish v. City of East Ridge, Tennessee et al (TV2)
as 1:2023cv00020
Defendant:
City of East Ridge, Tennessee, Anna Simmons, Samuel Roistacher and others
Plaintiff:
Johnathan W Ellish
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plyer v. Northline Utilities, LLC et al
as 1:2022cv00218
Plaintiff:
Danuta Plyer
Defendant:
Northline Utilities, LLC and Jacob D. Simmons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Sherrard, et al v. City of East Ridge, et al
as 1:2022cv00200
Plaintiff:
Angel Nicole Sherrard and Devin Lee Sherrard
Defendant:
City of East Ridge, Teddy Dyer, Candice Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Brown v. Partin et al
as 1:2020cv00235
Defendant:
Blake Simmons, Coffee County Jail and Sheriff Chad Partin
Plaintiff:
Derik Adam Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown v. Simmons et al
as 1:2020cv00217
Defendant:
Blake Simmons
Plaintiff:
Derik Adam Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv00162
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Simmons et al v. Wyndham Vacation Resorts, Inc. (TV1)
as 3:2020cv00029
Plaintiff:
Rebecca J. Simmons and Robert A. Simmons, Jr.
Defendant:
Wyndham Vacation Resorts, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
