Cases 1 - 10 of 23
Anglo American Lightning Organisation, LTD v. N422XS, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv00256
Plaintiff:
Anglo American Lightning Organisation, LTD
Defendant:
N422XS, Inc., M. Robert Simms, Kevin P. Centanni and others
3Rd Party Defendant:
Bill Leahy and Lee Scargall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Holland v. SIMMS Associates, Inc.
as 1:2020cv00255
Plaintiff:
Tamilee Holland
Defendant:
SIMMS Associates, Inc. and Simm Associates, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Bourgeoris et al v. Monsanto Company
as 3:2018cv00450
Plaintiff:
Steven Bussard, Cecil Taylor, Gregory Watts Simms and others
Defendant:
Monsanto Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Berry et al v. Simms et al
as 1:2017cv00081
Plaintiff:
Scott Berry and Jennifer Berry
Defendant:
Fegee Simms and John and Jane Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Simms v. International Longshoremen Association Local 1752
as 1:2015cv00339
Plaintiff:
Patrick Simms
Defendant:
International Longshoremen Association Local 1752
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 151
Goldmon v. Epps et al
as 4:2014cv00112
Plaintiff:
Antonio Goldmon
Defendant:
Christopher Epps, Lee, Timothy Morris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brassfield v. Simms
as 3:2014cv00405
Plaintiff:
Undraneckio Desmond Brassfield
Defendant:
Brenda Simms
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Patrick v. Davis et al
as 1:2014cv00058
Plaintiff:
Jackie Ray Patrick
Defendant:
Mark Davis, Hubert Davis, Brenda Simms and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Simoneaux v. Epps et al
as 1:2013cv00531
Plaintiff:
Richard Simoneaux
Defendant:
Christopher Epps , Ronald King , Hubert Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Simoneaux v. Epps et al
as 2:2013cv00113
Plaintiff:
Richard Simoneaux
Defendant:
Christopher Epps, Ronald King, Hubert Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
