Cases 41 - 50 of 69
Osman v. Six Unknown Names Agents, et al
as 16-13880
Plaintiff - Appellant:
OSMAN
Defendant - Appellee:
SIX UNKNOWN NAMES AGENTS and BARACK OBAMA, President of the United States
Rodriguez v. Six Unknown Names Agents, et al
as 16-13881
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RODRIGUEZ
Defendant - Appellee:
SIX UNKNOWN NAMES AGENTS and BARACK OBAMA, President of the United States
Guerrero v. Six Unknown Names Agents, et al
as 16-13879
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GUERRERO
Defendant - Appellee:
SIX UNKNOWN NAMES AGENTS and BARACK OBAMA, President of the United States
Tiapani v. Six Unknown Names Agents, et al
as 16-13877
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TIAPANI
Defendant - Appellee:
SIX UNKNOWN NAMES AGENTS and BARACK OBAMA, President of the United States
Walles et al v. Six Unknown Names Agents et al
as 4:2016cv00917
Plaintiff:
Derrick Walles and Young Yil Jo
Defendant:
Six Unknown Names Agents and Barack Obama
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Young Jo v. Six Unknown Names Agents, et al
as 16-13675
Plaintiff - Appellant:
YOUNG YIL JO
Defendant - Appellee:
SIX UNKNOWN NAMES AGENTS and PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES
Jo v. Six Unknown Names Agents et al
as 6:2016cv00040
Plaintiff:
Young Yil Jo
Defendant:
Mr. President of the United States Barack Obama and Six Unknown Names Agents
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Young Jo v. Six Unknown Names Agents, et al
as 16-10792
Plaintiff - Appellant:
YOUNG YIL JO
Defendant - Appellee:
SIX UNKNOWN NAMES AGENTS and PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES
Javed Ashig, et al v. Six Unknown Names Agents, et al
as 16-5073
Plaintiff:
JAVED ASHIG
Plaintiff - Appellant:
YOUNG YIL JO
Defendant - Appellee:
SIX UNKNOWN NAMES AGENTS and BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA
Young Jo v. Six Unknown Named Agents, et al
as 16-10089
Plaintiff - Appellant:
YOUNG YIL JO
Defendant - Appellee:
SIX UNKNOWN NAMED AGENTS and BARACK OBAMA, Mr. President of the United States
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
