Cases 1 - 10 of 15
SIZEMORE v. O'MALLEY
as 1:2024cv00229
Plaintiff:
Randall Sizemore
Defendant:
MARTIN J. O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Varney v. Sizemore, Inc. DO NOT DOCKET IN THIS CASE. SEE CASE # 5:23-CV-361-D-RJ
as 4:2023cv00107
Plaintiff:
Brant Varney
Defendant:
Sizemore, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Varney v. Sizemore, Inc.
as 5:2023cv00361
Plaintiff:
Brant Varney
Defendant:
Sizemore, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
PERARA v. SIZEMORE et al
as 1:2023cv00043
Plaintiff:
Robert Henry Perara and ROBERT HENRY PERARA, JR.
Defendant:
Officer M J. Sizemore, HIGH POINT POLICE DEPARTMENT, OFFICER M.J. SIZEMORE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
CRYAN et al v. NATIONAL COUNCIL OF YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATIONS OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2022cv00180
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH CRYAN, SAMUEL CRYAN, KERRY HELTON and others
Defendant:
NATIONAL COUNCIL OF YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATIONS OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Personal Injury
Sizemore v. Saul
as 1:2020cv00297
Plaintiff:
Mark Edwin Sizemore
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
SIZEMORE v. SAUL
as 1:2020cv00696
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Defendant:
ANDREW M. SAUL
Plaintiff:
RANDALL SIZEMORE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
SIZEMORE v. BERRYHILL
as 1:2017cv00837
Plaintiff:
CINDY LEE SIZEMORE
Defendant:
NANCY A. BERRYHILL
Interested_party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
Sizemore v. Colvin
as 5:2015cv00053
Plaintiff:
David Richard Sizemore
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Kitchen et al v. Barton et al
as 1:2014cv00122
Plaintiff:
Michael A. Kitchen and Lisa Charlene Honeycutt
Defendant:
Patrick Barton, Shawn Miller, Jason Page and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
