Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 51
IN RE SUBPOENAS ISSUED TO JEFFREY WILLIAMS AND BRUCE WATROUS JR. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2023cv01475
Plaintiff: Sjunde AP-Fonden and Metzler Asset Management GmbH
Defendant: Qualcomm Incorporated
Petitioner: Apple, Inc., Jeffrey Williams and Bruce Watrous, Jr.
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
IN RE SUBPOENAS ISSUED TO JEFFREY WILLIAMS AND BRUCE WATROUS JR. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2023mc80181
Petitioner: Apple Inc., Jeffrey Williams and Bruce Watrous, Jr.
Not Classified By Court: Sjunde AP-Fonden, Metzler Asset Management GMBH and Qualcomm Incorporated
Rasesh Shah, et al v. Qualcomm Incorporated, et al
as 23-80025
Respondent: RASESH SHAH, Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, METZLER ASSET MANAGEMENT GMBH and SJUNDE AP-FONDEN
Petitioner: QUALCOMM INCORPORATED, STEVE MOLLENKOPF, PAUL E. JACOBS and others
Hillier v. Zillow Group Inc et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2022cv00014
Plaintiff: Aaron Winston Hillier and Sjunde AP-Fonden
Defendant: Zillow Group, Inc., Richard N Barton, Lloyd D Frink and others
Petitioner: Slav Danev
In Re: Luckin Coffee Inc. Secu
as 21-1898
Plaintiff: Martin Cohen, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Shek Chun Wai, Christophe Sterckx and others
Plaintiff / Appellee: Sjunde Ap-Fonden and Louisiana Sheriffs Pension & Relief Fund
Defendant: Charles Zhengyao Lu, Jian Liu, Erhai Liu and others
Appellant: Kingstown Capital Management, L.P., Kingstown Partners Master Ltd., Kingstown Partners II L.P. and others
Defendant / Appellee: Luckin Coffee Inc. and Thomas P. Meir
In Re: Luckin Coffee Inc. Secu
as 21-1683
Plaintiff: Sjunde AP-Fonden, Louisiana Sheriffs Pension & Relief Fund, Martin Cohen, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated and others
Defendant: Charles Zhengyao Lu, Jian Liu, Erhai Liu and others
Appellant: Michael Bergenholtz, Teamsters Local 710 Pension Fund, City of Fort Myers Police Officers' Retirement System and others
Defendant / Appellee: Thomas P. Meir, Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC, Morgan Stanley & Co. LLC and others
In Re: Luckin Coffee Inc. Secu
as 21-1673
Plaintiff: Sjunde AP-Fonden, Louisiana Sheriffs Pension & Relief Fund, Martin Cohen, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated and others
Appellant: Winslow Funds, Michael Bergenholtz, Teamsters Local 710 Pension Fund and others
Defendant / Appellee: Luckin Coffee Inc., Thomas P. Meir, Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC and others
Defendant: Jenny Zhiya Qian, Reinout Hendrik Schakel, Sean Shao and others
IN RE 3M COMPANY SECURITIES LITIGATION We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 0:2020cv02488
Defendant: Inge G. Thulin, Nicholas C. Gangestad, Michael F. Roman and others
Plaintiff: Iron Workers Local 580 Joint Funds, State of Rhode Island, Office of the Treasurer on Behalf of the Employees' Retirement System of the State of Rhode Island, Heavy & Laborers' Locals 472 & 172 Welfare Fund and others
Petitioner: Sjunde AP-Fonden, MP Investment Management A/S and Amalgamated Bank
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
Sterckx v. Luckin Coffee Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv03304
Petitioner: Luckin Investor Group, Majid Hajizadeh Bashy, Teamsters Local 710 Pension Fund and others
Defendant: Charles Zhengyao Lu, China International Capital Corporation Hong Kong Securities Limited, Luckin Coffee Inc. and others
Plaintiff: Christophe Sterckx, Nirmala Gopu, Michael Bergenholtz and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
Sterckx v. Luckin Coffee Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2020cv01677
Defendant: Morgan Stanley & Co. LLC, Luckin Coffee Inc., Hui Li and others
Plaintiff: Christophe Sterckx, Nirmala Gopu, Vijaya Gopu and others
Petitioner: Luckin Investor Group, Majid Hajizadeh Bashy, Teamsters Local 710 Pension Fund and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?