Cases 11 - 20 of 5,601
Lim v. New York State Board of Law Examiners et al
as 4:2024cv00398
Plaintiff:
Khor Chin Lim
Defendant:
New York State Board of Law Examiners, City of Chicago, Illinois, Lucien Wong and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Smith et al v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. et al
as 1:2024cv00061
Plaintiff:
Glenn Smith and Margarita Smith
Defendant:
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. and Juanita Hernandez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Smith v. Arc Devices LTD
as 3:2024cv01050
Plaintiff:
Michael smith
Defendant:
Arc Devices LTD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv01603
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Dairyland Produce LLC v. Smith et al
as 4:2024cv01605
Plaintiff:
Dairyland Produce LLC
Defendant:
anthony smith and Florida Veg Investments LLC dba Mr Greens Produce
Ackerman et al v. Arkema Inc.
as 4:2024cv01588
Plaintiff:
Dorothy Ackerman, Mary Ackerman, Sylbestre Aburto and others
Defendant:
Arkema Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Incorrectly Filed
as 4:2024cv01582
Plaintiff:
Tonya Smith
Defendant:
The Guardian Life Insurance Company of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
Smith v. The Guardian Life Insurance Company of America
as 4:2024cv01583
Plaintiff:
Tonya Smith
Defendant:
The Guardian Life Insurance Company of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
Briggs v. Smith et al
as 5:2024cv00437
Plaintiff:
Michael Briggs
Defendant:
Jordan Smith and New Prime Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
LQ Logistics LLC v. Faison et al
as 4:2024cv00359
Plaintiff:
LQ Logistics LLC
Defendant:
Robert Faison, Sandra Smith, Sedgwick Claims Management Services, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
