Cases 1 - 7 of 7
United States of America v. One (1) Smith & Wesson M&P, 45 Pistol, CAL:45 SN:DXV1150 et al
as 2:2023cv02565
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
One (1) Smith & Wesson M&P, 45 Pistol, CAL:45 SN:DXV1150, One (1) Glock GMBH 22 Pistol, CAL:40 SN:TGS716 and One (1) Ruger Ruger-57 Pistol, CAL:57 SN:643-04159
Claimant:
Stephen Sanders and Rebecca Slayton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1341 Complaint for Forfeiture
Rasco et al v. BTI Tools, LLC et al

as 3:2022cv00149
Defendant:
BTI Tools, LLC, Smith & Wesson, Inc, Smith and Wesson Brands, Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Brey C Rasco and Twyla Rasco
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
United States of America v. One Smith & Wesson Loaded with 16 Rounds of Ammunition et al
as 3:2017cv01403
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
One Smith & Wesson Loaded with 16 Rounds of Ammunition and One Glock with Extended Magazine
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 0922
United States of America v. Smith & Wesson SD9VE Pistol Cal.9 Serial Number FWM1753 and 15 Rounds of Ammunition
as 3:2017cv00279
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Smith & Wesson SD9VE Pistol Cal.9 Serial Number FWM1753 and 15 Rounds of Ammunition
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 0922
McNeal et al v. Smith & Wesson Corporation et al

as 3:2016cv00067
Plaintiff:
Randy McNeal and Vicki McNeal
Defendant:
Smith & Wesson Corporation and Unidentified John Doe Employees
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
McNeal et al v. Smith & Wesson Corporation et al
as 3:2014cv02394
Plaintiff:
Randy McNeal and Vicki McNeal
Defendant:
Smith & Wesson Corporation and John Does
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Beverly et al v. Smith & Wesson Corporation et al

as 1:2012cv00365
Defendant:
Thompson/Center , Smith & Wesson Corporation , Sports South, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony Dean Beverly and Kathy Lynn Beverly
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.