Cases 1 - 10 of 44
Daniels v. Smith County Sheriff
as 6:2024cv00077
Plaintiff:
Randy K. Daniels
Defendant:
Smith County Sheriff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Hillhouse et al
as 6:2023cv00298
Defendant:
Chris Tinsley, Derick Choice, Nancy Perryman and others
Plaintiff:
Jay Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hunter v. Boller et al
as 6:2023cv00154
Plaintiff:
James Anthony Hunter
Defendant:
Officer FNU Boller, Officer FNU Mitchell, Officer FNU Taylor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Baize v. District One et al
as 6:2023cv00106
Plaintiff:
Angelena N. Baize
Defendant:
District One, Henderson County, TX, Smith County, TX and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Morgan v. Smith
as 6:2022cv00358
Petitioner:
Raymond Lonzo Morgan
Respondent:
Smith County Sheriff Larry . Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 s Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Richardson v. Waldrop et al
as 6:2021cv00421
Plaintiff:
James P. Richardson
Defendant:
Sheri Waldrop, Unknown Officers, Nika Fobb and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ray v. Bingham et al
as 6:2021cv00287
Plaintiff:
Jerremy Ray
Defendant:
Matt Bingham, Bryan Jiral, O W Loyd and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shaw v. Smith et al
as 6:2021cv00136
Defendant:
Susie Saxion, Angela Faulkner, Smith County Sheriff Department and others
Plaintiff:
William Shaw
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Roberts v. Smith County Sheriff Department et al
as 6:2021cv00100
Defendant:
Smith County Sheriff Department, Better Business Bureau, United States of America and others
Plaintiff:
James Earl Roberts
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Taylor v. Smith County Sheriff
as 6:2020cv00602
Respondent:
Smith County Sheriff
Plaintiff:
Bennie Ray Taylor
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
