Cases 1 - 10 of 70
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv04766
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
Kioki Snowden v. Unknown
as 2:2023cv06442
Petitioner:
Kioki Snowden
Respondent:
Unknown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Richard Ceja et al v. Beverly Hills Police Department et al
as 2:2022cv05884
Plaintiff:
Richard Ceja, Brian Weir and Finn O McClafferty
Defendant:
The City of Beverly Hills, The Beverly Hills Police Department, Capt. Mark Rosen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
(PC) Snowden v. Scott et al
as 2:2022cv01444
Plaintiff:
Curtis Snowden, III
Defendant:
A Scott, Jones, Yang and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Beverly Clemons Snowden v. County of Riverside et al
as 5:2022cv01085
Plaintiff:
Beverly Clemons Snowden
Defendant:
County of Riverside, a legal subdivision of the State of California, County of Riverside and Does 1-10, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
(PC) Snowden v. Sullivan et al
as 1:2020cv00415
Plaintiff:
Daniel L. Snowden
Defendant:
Jerrick Block, W. Sullivan, C. Schuyler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Snowden v. Falco et al
as 2:2019cv01299
Defendant:
G. Swift, Uddin and Falco
Plaintiff:
Kioki Ray Snowden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Snowden v. Tate et al
as 1:2019cv00843
Plaintiff:
Daniel L. Snowden
Defendant:
M. Toscano and DR. Harold Tate
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Daryll Van Snowden v. Stephen A. Cazares et al
as 2:2019cv03534
Defendant:
Stephen A. Cazares, Ellyn Marcus Lindsay and Adam Storer
Plaintiff:
Daryll Van Snowden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
(PC) Howell v. Johnson et al
as 2:2019cv00611
Defendant:
D. Anderson, J. Gamboa, J. Johnson and others
Plaintiff:
Kareem J. Howell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
