Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv04766
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
Snowden v. Sprint Nextel Corporation
as 3:2013cv00653
Plaintiff:
Kim Snowden
Defendant:
Sprint Nextel Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Account Receivable
Snowden v. Rackley
as 3:2012cv03983
Petitioner:
Darnell D. Snowden
Respondent:
R. J. Rackley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Snowden v. Rackley
as 3:2012cv03984
Petitioner:
Darnell D. Snowden
Respondent:
R. J. Rackley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Rancho de Calistoga v. City of Calistoga et al
as 3:2011cv05015
Petitioner:
Rancho de Calistoga
Respondent:
City of Calistoga and W. Scott Snowden
Miscellaneou:
The Tenants Residing at Rancho de Calistoga Mobilehome Park
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Embrey et al v. General Electric Company et al
as 3:2009cv00363
Plaintiff:
Patricia Embrey, Patricia Embrey, Tracy Embrey Hernandez and others
Defendant:
General Electric Company, Newport News Shipbuilding and Dry Dock Company, United States Steel Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Rodriguez v. Snowden et al
as 5:2008cv03778
Plaintiff:
Ronnie Rodriguez
Defendant:
Snowden and Casagrande
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Secure Investment Services, Inc. et al
as 3:2007mc80214
Plaintiff:
Securities and Exchange Commission, Securities and Exchange Commission, Securities and Exchange Commission and others
Defendant:
Secure Investment Services, Inc., American Financial Services, Lyndon Group, Inc. and others
Wilmshurst v. Marriott of San Francisco et al
as 3:2007cv03790
Plaintiff:
Richard E. Wilmshurst
Defendant:
Marriott of San Francisco, Sam Snowden, Ignatius Chinn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
