Cases 1 - 10 of 14,451
Daniel v. Social Security Administration Commissioner
as 5:2024cv05108
Plaintiff:
Bobby Daniel
Defendant:
Social Security Administration Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Smith v. Social Security Administration Commissioner
as 4:2024cv04050
Plaintiff:
Christopher Smith
Defendant:
Social Security Administration Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Anderson v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 4:2024cv00171
Plaintiff:
Douglas Anderson
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Osmanovic v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 4:2024cv00679
Plaintiff:
Merima Osmanovic
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Katie Rygmyr v. Martin O'Malley
as 24-2005
Plaintiff:
Katie Rygmyr
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley, Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Onken v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2024cv04017
Interested Party:
Ssaogcomms
Plaintiff:
Amber Onken
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Ford v. Social Security Administration
as 4:2024cv00420
Plaintiff:
Erica Ford
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 Review of HHS Decision
Owens v. Social Security Administration Commissioner
as 6:2024cv06029
Plaintiff:
Letia Owens
Defendant:
Social Security Administration Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 g Review of HHS Decision (RSI)
Rippeto-Bruner v. Social Security Administration Commissioner
as 6:2024cv06028
Plaintiff:
Annette Rippeto-Bruner
Defendant:
Social Security Administration Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Jamila Reeves v. Martin O'Malley
as 24-1977
Plaintiff:
Jamila Reeves
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley, Commissioner, Social Security Administration
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
