Cases 1 - 10 of 46
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2023cv00580
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Jason M. Paley v. Kimberly A. Knill et al
as 8:2022cv01645
Plaintiff:
Jason M. Paley
Defendant:
Kimberly A. Knill, David H. Yamasaki, Kevin H. Mello and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jason M. Paley v. Kimberly A. Knill et al
as 8:2022cv01578
Plaintiff:
Jason M. Paley
Defendant:
Kimberly A. Knill, David H. Yamasaki, K. Wilson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jason M. Paley v. Kimberly A. Knill et al
as 8:2022cv01553
Plaintiff:
Jason M. Paley
Defendant:
Kimberly A. Knill, David H. Yamasaki, K. Wilson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
USA v. Eric Sokol
as 21-30170
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
ERIC MALLARD SOKOL
Tristram Buckley v. BMW of North America, et al
as 20-56397
Defendant / Appellee:
BMW GALLERY, EUROPEAN AUTOMOTIVE GALLERY INC., BAYERISCHE MOTOREN WERKE AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TRISTRAM T. BUCKLEY
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv10691
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Tristram Buckley v. BMW of North America, et al
as 20-55769
Defendant / Appellee:
BMW GALLERY, EUROPEAN AUTOMOTIVE GALLERY INC., BAYERISCHE MOTOREN WERKE AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TRISTRAM T. BUCKLEY
Mikhail Sokol v. William Barr
as 20-71361
Petitioner:
MIKHAIL SERGEYEVICH SOKOL
Respondent:
WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General
Danielle Sokol v. State Farm General Insurance Company et al
as 8:2020cv00128
Plaintiff:
Danielle Sokol
Defendant:
DOES 1 through 10, inclusive and State Farm General Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
