Cases 1 - 10 of 76
Saldana-Solano v. Garland
as 24-60043
Petitioner:
Denis Jesus Saldana-Solano
Respondent:
Merrick Garland, U.S. Attorney General
Solano v. Director, TDCJ
as 6:2024cv00007
Petitioner:
Jairo Francisco Solano
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv02334
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Solano v. Underwriters At Lloyds London
as 2:2022cv03848
Plaintiff:
Cesar Solano
Defendant:
Underwriters At Lloyds London and Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's London
Interested Party:
Hurricane Ida Program Administrator
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Solano v. Allstate Vehicle & Property Insurance Co
as 2:2022cv04620
Plaintiff:
Sherelyn Solano
Defendant:
Allstate Vehicle & Property Insurance Co
Special Master:
Patrick A Juneau, Jr and Cade Richard Cole
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Solano v. Wal-Mart Store Texas, LLC
as 4:2022cv02795
Plaintiff:
Susy Solano
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Store Texas, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
USA v. Larraga Solano
as 22-40534
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Juan Victor Larraga Solano, also known as Juan Larraga Solano
USA v. Gonzalez-Solano
as 22-50369
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Geovanni Gonzalez-Solano
Vasquez Solano v. USA
as 4:2022cv00161
Petitioner:
Santiago Vasquez Solano
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Premier Financial Services, LLC v. Ramirez
as 3:2022cv00059
Plaintiff:
Premier Financial Services, LLC
Defendant:
Javier Ricardo Solano Ramirez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
