Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 2,849
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00102
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Construction Laborers Trust Funds for Southern California Administrative Company v. Arrow Signs HC, Inc.
as 5:2024cv00020
Defendant: ARROW SIGNS HC, INC., a California corporation also known as and doing business as ARROW SIGN, and doing business as ARROW SIGN, Arrow Signs HC, Inc. and others
Plaintiff: CONSTRUCTION LABORERS TRUST FUNDS FOR SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ADMINISTRATIVE COMPANY, a Delaware limited liability company and Construction Laborers Trust Funds for Southern California Administrative Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Nadia Palafox v. Kaiser Permanente Insurance Company et al
as 2:2024cv00011
Plaintiff: Nadia Palafox
Defendant: Kaiser Permanente Insurance Company, Kaiser Foundation Health Plan, Inc., Southern California Permanente Medical Group, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Medical Malpractice
Nadia Palafox v. Kaiser Permanente Insurance Company et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 8:2024cv00013
Plaintiff: Nadia Palafox
Defendant: Kaiser Permanente Insurance Company, Kaiser Foundation Health Plan, Inc., Southern California Permanente Medical Group, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Medical Malpractice
Construction Laborers Trust Funds for Southern California Administrative Company v. Taft Electric Company
as 2:2023cv10908
Plaintiff: CONSTRUCTION LABORERS TRUST FUNDS FOR SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ADMINISTRATIVE COMPANY, a Delaware limited liability company and Construction Laborers Trust Funds for Southern California Administrative Company
Defendant: Taft Electric Company, a California corporation and Taft Electric Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2023cv02501
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv10904
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Trustees of the Operating Engineers Pension Trust et al v. California Trenchless, Inc.
as 2:2023cv10890
Plaintiff: Trustees of the Operating Engineers Pension Trust, Trustees of the Operating Engineers Local 12 Defined Contribution Trust, Trustees of the Operating Engineers Health and Welfare Fund and others
Defendant: California Trenchless, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1145 E.R.I.S.A.
Board of Trustees of Sheet Metal Workers Pension Plan of Southern California Arizona and Nevada et al v. Stiles Consulting Firm LLC dba Stiles Foodservice & Stainless Installation et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2023cv10858
Plaintiff: Board of Trustees of Sheet Metal Workers Pension Plan of Southern California, Arizona and Nevada, Board of Trustees of Sheet Metal Workers Health Plan of Southern California, Arizona and Nevada, Board of Trustees of Southern California Sheet Metal Joint Apprenticeship and Training Committee and others
Defendant: Stiles Consulting Firm LLC dba Stiles Foodservice & Stainless Installation, Corey William Stiles and Stiles Consulting Firm LLC doing business as Stiles Foodservice & Stainless Installation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.
Trustees of the Operating Engineers Pension Trust et al v. Classic Street Sweeping LLC We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 8:2023cv02429
Plaintiff: Trustees of the Operating Engineers Pension Trust, Trustees of the Operating Engineers Health and Welfare Fund, Trustees of the Operating Engineers Vacation-Holiday Savings Trust and others
Defendant: Classic Street Sweeping LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1145 E.R.I.S.A.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?