Cases 1 - 5 of 5
Scott v. Southern Electric Supply Company, Inc.
as 3:2013cv00119
Plaintiff:
Brandon Scott
Defendant:
Southern Electric Supply Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Rexel, Inc. et al v. Holcomb et al
as 8:2012cv00678
Plaintiff:
Rexel, Inc. , Rexel Development SAS and Southern Electric Supply Company, Inc.
Defendant:
Robert R. Holcomb and Redemptech Holdings PTY, LTD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
Southern Electric Supply Company, Inc. v. Native American Services, Corp. et al
as 1:2011cv03824
Plaintiff:
Southern Electric Supply Company, Inc.
Defendant:
Native American Services, Corp., Laminack Electric Company, Inc., Mark C. Laminack and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1352
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv02751
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 626
Louisville Jefferson County Metro Government v. HNTB Corporation et al
as 3:2007cv00052
Plaintiff:
Louisville Jefferson County Metro Government and Louisville Jefferson County Metro Government
Defendant:
HNTB Corporation, Barton Malow Company, Turner Construction Company and others
ThirdParty Plaintiff:
Turner Construction Company, Barton Malow Company and Arrow Electric Company
ThirdParty Defendant:
Arrow Electric Company, Arrow Electric Company and Southern Electric Supply Company, Inc. d/b/a Rexel/Southland
Counter Claimant:
Arrow Electric Company and Arrow Electric Company
Cross Defendant:
Turner Construction Company, Barton Malow Company and Arrow Electric Company
Counter Defendant:
Louisville Jefferson County Metro Government, Louisville Jefferson County Metro Government and HNTB Corporation
Cross Claimant:
Louisville Jefferson County Metro Government and Louisville Jefferson County Metro Government
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
