Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Cellco Partnership v. Town of Southwick, Massachusetts et al
as 1:2021cv10414
Defendant:
Michael Doherty, Richard Utzinger, Town of Southwick, Massachusetts and others
Plaintiff:
Cellco Partnership doing business as Verizon Wireless
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Cellco Partnership v. Town of Southwick, Massachusetts et al
as 3:2021cv10414
Defendant:
Michael Doherty, Richard Utzinger, Town of Southwick, Massachusetts and others
Plaintiff:
Cellco Partnership doing business as Verizon Wireless
Intervenor:
James Amistadi, James Patryn, Corrine Rolland and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv30035
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv10078
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv10078
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Barry v. Southwick Wild Animal Farm, Inc.
as 4:2017cv40154
Plaintiff:
John Barry
Defendant:
Southwick Wild Animal Farm, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv30013
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bellone v. Southwick-Tolland Regional
as 13-1341
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SCOTT BELLONE
Defendant - Appellee:
SOUTHWICK-TOLLAND REGIONAL SCHOOL DISTRICT
Lloyd v. Burt et al
as 3:2013cv30011
Defendant:
Greg Burt and Southwick, Town of
Plaintiff:
Christina Lloyd
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
O'Brien v. Lifestyle Transportation, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv11522
Plaintiff:
Oliver O'Brien
Defendant:
Lifestyle Transportation, Inc. and Michael Southwick
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
