Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Rowe et al v. One Span Powerline Services, LLC
as 3:2023cv00879
Plaintiff:
Jeff Rowe, Michael McCain and Southern Electrical Retirement Fund
Defendant:
One Span Powerline Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.
Span v. Uhlmann Packaging Systems, LP et al
as 3:2022cv01383
Plaintiff:
Andrew D. Span
Defendant:
Uhlmann Packaging Systems, LP and Does 1-100
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Musick v. SPAN Transit et al
as 4:2021cv00189
Plaintiff:
Howard R Musick
Defendant:
Jona Coronado, SPAN Transit and Kristine Herrera
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Board of Trustees of the California Ironworkers Field Pension Trust et al v. Golden State Erectors Inc et al
as 2:2014cv01625
Plaintiff:
Board of Trustees of the California Field Iron Workers Administrative Trust, Board of Trustees of the California Field Iron Workers Vacation Trust Fund, Board of Trustees of the California Field Ironworkers Apprenticeship Training and Journeyman Retraining Fund and others
Defendant:
Clear Span Construction Inc, Golden State Erectors Inc, Barbara Louise McDaniel and others
Luna et al v. Spic & Span Maid & Window Cleaning Services, Inc. et al
as 4:2010cv02491
Defendant:
Spic & Span Maid & Window Cleaning Services, Inc., Felicia Hernandez and Rolando Gonzalez
Plaintiff:
Maria E. Luna , Miriam J. Cruz , Maria A. Chavez and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938
Zurich American Insurance Co. v. Span Construction & Engineering, Inc.
as 3:2007cv00507
Plaintiff:
Zurich American Insurance Co.
Defendant:
Span Construction & Engineering, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Labor/Mgmnt. Relatio
Span v. Air Concepts of Mid-Florida, Inc. et al
as 6:2007cv00245
Plaintiff:
David T Span, III
Defendant:
Air Concepts of Mid-Florida, Inc. and David W Hulker
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
