Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Patrick Nazemi v. Specialized Loan Servicing LLC, et al
as 22-56091
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PATRICK NAZEMI, an individual
Defendant / Appellee:
SPECIALIZED LOAN SERVICING LLC, a limited liability company, COMPUTERSHARE HOLDINGS, INC., a corporation and DOES, 1 through 10, inclusive
Patrick Nazemi v. Specialized Loan Servicing LLC et al
as 2:2022cv05006
Plaintiff:
Patrick Nazemi
Defendant:
Specialized Loan Servicing LLC, Computershare Holdings, Inc. and Does 1 through 10, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7422 IRS: Refund Taxes
Karam v. Specialized Loan Servicing LLC
as 4:2022cv00029
Plaintiff:
Rose A Karam
Defendant:
Specialized Loan Servicing LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Choudhuri v. Specialized Loan Services LLC et al
as 4:2019cv00028
Plaintiff:
Kabita Choudhuri
Defendant:
Britt Johnson, Specialized Loan Services LLC and Barbara Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Nahid Kabir v. Flagstar Bank, FSB et al
as 8:2016cv00360
Defendant:
DOES, Flagstar Bank, FSB and Specialized Loan Servicing, LLC
Plaintiff:
Nahid Kabir
Maryann Broyles v. Specialized Loan Servicing, LL, et al
as 14-16043
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARYANN ROSE BROYLES, individually and as co-trustee of the Maryann Rose Broyles Revocable Trust
Defendant - Appellee:
SPECIALIZED LOAN SERVICING, LLC and WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., as Trustee for Banc of America Alternative Loan Trust 2006-7 Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2006-7
Broyles v. Bank of America, N.A. et al
as 1:2013cv00540
Plaintiff:
Maryann Rose Broyles
Defendant:
Bank of America, N.A., Specialized Loan Servicing, LLC, John Does 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
Del Fierro v. American Brokers Conduit et al
as 2:2009cv00883
Plaintiff:
Lorina G Del Fierro
Defendant:
American Brokers Conduit, HomEq Servicing, Equifirst Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
