Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00421
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Spire, Inc., et al v. DOE
as 22-1117
Petitioner:
Spire, Inc., Spire Missouri Inc. and Spire Alabama Inc.
Respondent:
United States Department of Energy
Spire Inc., et al v. DOE
as 22-2294
Petitioner:
Spire, Inc., Spire Missouri, Inc. and Spire Alabama Inc.
Respondent:
United States Department of Energy
American Gas Association, et al v. DOE, et al
as 22-1030
Petitioner:
American Gas Association, American Public Gas Association, Spire, Inc. and others
Respondent:
United States Department of Energy and Jennifer M. Granholm, Secretary, U.S. Department of Energy
Washington Jr. v. Suffolk County Sheriff et al
as 2:2021cv05765
Plaintiff:
George Washington Jr.
Defendant:
Suffolk County Sheriff, India Embassy in USA, NYS Court System and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv01026
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Company, LP v. Hays, Trustee of the Jason & Melissa Hays Trust et al
as 2:2020cv04069
Defendant:
Laclede Gas Company n/k/a Spire Inc., Jason Hays, Trustee of the Jason & Melissa Hays Trust, 0.34 Acres of Real Estate in Moniteau County, Missouri and others
Plaintiff:
Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Company, LP
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
Spire, Inc., et al v. U.S. Department of Energy
as 20-1503
Respondent:
United States Department of Energy
Petitioner:
Spire Missouri, Inc. and Spire, Inc.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00025
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2019cv00623
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
