Cases 1 - 10 of 23
Nixon v. Rutter et al
as 1:2023cv00627
Defendant:
St. Francis Hospital Transport Co., Amie Rutter, Tamika Scott and others
Plaintiff:
Curtis Nixon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Erin Bickley v. St. Francis Hospital
as 23-1506
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ERIN M. BICKLEY
Defendant / Appellee:
ST FRANCIS HOSPITAL
Bickley v. St. Francis Hospital
as 1:2023cv00111
Plaintiff:
Erin M. Bickley
Defendant:
St. Francis Hospital
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Medical Malpractice
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01042
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Smith et al v. Serafimova, M.D. et al
as 1:2021cv01451
Plaintiff:
Tyrran Smith and Tatra Bradshaw
Defendant:
Neli Serafimova, M.D., Wesley Emmons, M.D., John D'Ambrosio, D.O. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
MCKINNEY v. LANIGAN et al
as 3:2018cv00309
Plaintiff:
IVAN G. MCKINNEY
Defendant:
GARY LANIGAN, RAJIV SHAH, PRESIDENT JOHN OR JANE DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Randy Baadhio v. Brian Hofacker, et al
as 17-2749
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RANDY BAADHIO
Defendant - Appellee:
BRIAN HOFACKER, Detective, MTPD, SEAN SULLIVAN, Police Officer, MTPD, ROBERT PALMER, Chief of Police and others
Randy Baadhio v. Brian Hofacker, et al
as 17-1462
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RANDY BAADHIO
Defendant - Appellee:
BRIAN HOFACKER, Detective MTPD, SEAN SULLIVAN, Police Officer, MTPD, ROBERT PALMER, Chief of Police, MTPD and others
In re: Randy Baadhio
as 16-1326
Plaintiff - Petitioner:
In re: RANDY BAADHIO
Defendant - Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL NEW JERSEY, STATE OF NEW JERSEY, CHAIRMAN NEW JERSEY STATE PAROLE BOARD and others
Nominal Respondent:
MICHAEL A. SHIPP
MCMENAMIN v. CHIURCO et al
as 3:2015cv08636
Plaintiff:
ANDREW MCMENAMIN
Defendant:
ANTHONY CHIURCO, ST. FRANCIS HOSPITAL and DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
